One of the biggest strategic risks to any systemic transformation process or strategy is the deep misunderstanding of the holographic and intimately interconnected nature of our macro-systems, open networks, or host communities. Our inability to grasp that every system, regardless of its size or influence, is always enveloped by a larger, more powerful macro-system is a significant challenge. No system exists with a "higher power" within itself—it simply doesn’t work that way, nor could it.
Every system is part of a host-system, contributing to a more complex whole. Each system also has the potential to create subsystems that can co-create new meta or macro-systems.
This process isn’t linear; it’s cyclical. It’s not predetermined; it’s emergent. There is no final "higher" or "lower." We live in an unlimited, multidimensional, ever-evolving reality, and what we consider the highest or lowest today may not hold much meaning tomorrow.
In living systems, the boundaries of maximum and minimum power or influence are never stable or certain. These limits can always be stretched or altered.
This is why comparing systems in terms of higher or lower power makes no sense. From a systemic perspective, these measurements are meaningless.
Today, some individuals seem to hold more "power" than entire, highly sophisticated systems, but this doesn’t mean they are not governed by larger macro-systems that "host" them or exercise authority over them.
Every system is part of a larger "mother" system or host community.
During network-wide transformation processes, most problems arise not within the system being transformed but within the existing macro-system or host community.
When transforming from object A to object B without altering the hosting macro-system (keeping the process within the same "mother" matrix), the transformation is relatively straightforward. The process is governed by pre-existing rules, limits, and power dynamics of the host community.
The real challenge in systemic transformation arises when both the system and its hosting macro-system need to change simultaneously.
If a transformation strategy affects the macro-system where most of the system’s activities occur and is not done appropriately, respecting the principles and rules in place, the host community will resist.
This is the concept of infinite loops: system 1 inside system 2 inside system 3, and so on. To enact radical change that impacts larger host systems, one must master the mechanics and dynamics of network-wide transformation.
Radical innovation at both the systemic and hosting community level is a significant challenge. Implementing a successful transformation at both levels of a macro-hierarchy is complex and often difficult.
Changing a small business or team project is one thing, but attempting to impact an entire sector, industry, or community is entirely different. Such a process requires different strategies, governance, and leadership methodologies compared to transforming a closed system within a stable macro-system.
The "system-in-system" dynamic makes transformation processes more unpredictable, unsafe, and uncertain. Co-creating coherent, sustainable change at the level of shared, decentralized networks is one of the biggest strategic challenges today.
The more radical and macro the change, the more complex the transformation process. In theory, you can transform anything, but the road to achieving those goals becomes increasingly sophisticated the further you go, especially if you engage with systems beyond your current understanding or influence.
Truly changing yourself is difficult, and most people fail. Changing an entire family system or business is nearly impossible. Attempting to transform a macro-system based solely on personal beliefs, ego-driven preferences, or judgments is irrational.
If you believe you can change a macro-system or community using outdated tools and methodologies, you are profoundly ignorant of how our shared reality works. You are also unaware of emergent co-evolution and may even be in a dangerous self-delusion about your true power and influence.
Macro-systems are holographic and deeply interconnected with the fabric of society, culture, civilization, and humanity. They are interdependent with the micro-systems and individual lives that surround them. When engaging with a macro-system, you are literally affecting the well-being, and sometimes the survival, of many people.
This is why high levels of responsibility, increased collaboration, and commitment to a larger purpose are crucial when co-creating systemic change. No one should attempt to change an entire system alone or in a small group. The system will resist if the interests of the larger community are not included.
A host community is a network of sovereign beings with the power to oversee, modify, or stop any systemic transformation that impacts their reality.
We all belong to multiple "hosting" communities. We are deeply aware of group-level biases and the importance of community approval. The fear of being rejected, judged, or censored by the host community is often stronger than the fear of death.
Being cut off from the community is the greatest threat to survival, and this knowledge is deeply ingrained in our psyche. This is why we tend to follow the masses—it feels safer.
“If I do the same as others, I increase my chances of survival, success, and happiness.” This seems logical and rational, which is why many continue to conform to group identities and realities.
And it’s also why collective change is so difficult. Groups tend to be static, stuck in cycles, and resistant to systemic change. This is largely due to fear and an inability to align with inner truth when it conflicts with community opinion.
While individuals constantly evolve and transform, the strategies for managing groups, communities, and networks evolve much more slowly. This gap between personal and collective evolution is responsible for many social distortions and systemic abuses.
Our inability to truly consider the host communities and networks where systemic transformations take place is the main reason we fail to achieve meaningful, successful change.
If you claim to work for others, you must first ask what they need or want. It’s not about what you believe is best for them but what is truly coherent and valuable to them. Additionally, just because you are leading a transformation doesn’t mean you have control over the free will of others. You can contribute to the system, but none of this gives you power over others.
Nothing guarantees others will listen, agree, or follow. The host community always holds more power than individual sub-systems, especially those acting in isolation or without the input of the collective network.
Even at the highest levels of authority, power is systemically shared and distributed. The host community always has the final word, and it is always bigger than those in positions of leadership.
We are the host community for our leaders and the macro-system we all share. We decide who is worth listening to, which strategies make sense, and what our future will look like. We can choose to open doors and change the rules of how we co-create our collective future, deciding who is responsible for systemic transformation and under what conditions.
…
The truth is, we are never separate from the systems we aim to transform. The very act of imagining change already entangles us deeper in the web of interconnected realities. But as much as we are woven into these networks, we are also the threads capable of weaving something entirely new.
The power of transformation doesn’t come from controlling the system or bending it to our will—it comes from our ability to listen, to feel the pulse of the whole, and to respond with a deep understanding that no single voice, no matter how loud, can carry the weight of change alone.
In the end, the host community isn’t just the container of our efforts; it’s the living, breathing consciousness that guides and shapes them. If we fail to recognize this, we lose the essence of transformation itself. True systemic change is a co-creation—a dance between the individual and the collective, the micro and the macro, the visible and the invisible.
And perhaps this is the most important realization of all: transformation doesn’t happen when we fight the system; it happens when we become the system, when we dissolve the boundaries between “us” and “it,” and when we allow ourselves to be transformed in return.
As we step into this space of shared responsibility, the question isn’t whether we can change the world—but whether we’re willing to surrender to the truth that the world is already changing us.
In this, we are no longer leaders or followers. We are simply participants in a greater unfolding, trusting that our role, however small or grand, is meaningful in the symphony of collective evolution.
Comments